omilidio In order to net slow down in expansion, we would have to burn more than a few tokens if we were to adopt this strategy while having an AKR of 800%. Also, we have to consider where the burn supply is coming from - there are two possible sources - DAO Treasury or KLIMA/Carbon LP.
DAO Treasury - We use this source to pay builders/contributors of the project, there are only about 100K KLIMA in there. If we burn this source, we'd be burning the lifeline that sustains project builders. And builders are who we need in this bear climate.
KLIMA/Carbon LP - Burning this source is not ideal as it goes in direct contradiction to our goal of horizontal development of the KLIMA liquidity rail which we want as a public good.
For the above reasons, this is why we have an alternative and that is inverse bonds with USDC (currently sitting in the DAO wallet). You achieve the same effect but over a period of time and dependant on market demand. However for it to have net positive effect on the token supply, we still need to reduce the AKR drastically. Otherwise, inverse bonds would not be effective and we would be wasting precious resources from the treasury.