• General

  • Request for Comment - KLIMA X MOSS collaboration

yes pls. me like KLIMA-MCO2 and MCO2 bonds

I would like to see MCO2- BCT bond! If that goes well maby more bonds cold be developed. Just want be cautious about new assets that is backing klimas treasure. Good proposal! My vote is neutral for now.

If these 2 can collab, it would be one of the best idea for csrbon off sets.

I have read the Moss website and the whitepaper and I am a little bit confused as to the specifics of how you guys tokenize your carbon credits. Are they not retired as soon as they are brought on chain?

    mustapo Same here. I wold like to see more documentation about the process how carbon credits is bridget to on chain, how and who has verified these projects and less about how to buy MCO2 token and about their market places. Website actually brings more concerns on my mind than answers.

        For: Introduce KLIMA-MCO2 and MCO2 bonds

        lancecord I wouldn’t worry too much about this as BCT already consists of units that are avoided emissions. A deep dive has been done already: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1rlInksw4PDilkOdJmxVqRDwDsbMqx3_Q?usp=sharing

        Are REDD+ or REDD the highest grade offsets? No, but they still are okay for the most part. The goal is to act like a black hole and ensure that other polluters can’t access them.

            greevesie Could that actually be one of the approvals? At least guiding one... Once so called polluter( and regulators) accepts one of offsets that's when Klima will approve them to to be a part of treasure 🤔

              Cooperation is important at on-chain carbon market. Cause we have a same goal . So , i vote yes on it .

              In favour of this for sure, 2022 here we come!

              Sirob As I am not an expert on what is going on, I would, as I don't have any better option, defer my yes/no to Sirob. He is clearly on the right path and seems to be asking the right questions.

              I do not think it is good enough for random people to simply agree or disagree on these types of decisions. Knowledgeable expertise needs to be utilized.

              I would rather propose that a professional and science based council be formed to vet these types of proposals.

              As someone that is certainly not knowledgeable enough to make an educated decision, I would think this would be required from a DAO like KLIMA so that people like me could feel comfortable voting on things like this.

                  RobXRP fully agree. I wonder if it would perhaps be possible to implement a delegation system for voting similar to what ENS DAO has done? I have no knowledge on these matters and don’t want Klima to be susceptible to third parties taking advantage of the layman like me with hidden agendas in this complex ecosystem. (To be clear: this is not an accusation of anyone at this stage!)

                    RobXRP
                    100%..... Couldn't agree.... No disrespect but such proposals shouldn't be put to randoms with little or no knowledge of such matters like myself to vote on.

                      I'm fully in favour of adding more assets to the treasury. And while I'm not an expert on the except strengths & weaknesses of MCO2 tokens (Sirob seems to raise some good questions), I just wanted to highlight one other point. We currently have about 60m liquidity in the KLIMA/BCT pool and 50m in the BCT/USDC pool. With this proposal we would add KLIMA/MCO2 liquidity - but is MOSS and/or KLIMA planning on creating a pool that would facilitate easy trading of MCO2 to stablecoins/other crypto assets?

                      If not, then people looking to trade/sell MCO2 will have to go MCO2 -> KLIMA -> BCT -> USDC. Not only is this hugely inefficient in terms of trading fees, it also means that we will be routing all selling pressure through the BCT/USDC pool which will depress the BCT price, the RFV of KLIMA, and thus in the end the KLIMA price itself.

                      I'm not advocating that KLIMA introduces a MCO2/USDC pool, but it would be good to clarify what MOSS plans to develop in terms of future pools to facilitate trading on Polygon.

                      As it stands, I would feel better about introducing just the MCO2 bonds for now and only at a later stage KLIMA/MCO2 bonds.