First of all... first (gottem)
Second of all... absolutely!
First of all... first (gottem)
Second of all... absolutely!
Extremely low risk move to help preserve USDC value while we figure out what to do with it - For
IBuyShitCoins It ain't much, but it's honest work
Wouldn't we need a lot more than 2-3% to mitigate inflation?
Or is this the highest yield to be found given the criteria?
I'm a smooth-brain, just trying to understand.^^
Is earning $UST on Anchor Protocol (20%) worth considering or too risky?
I'm 'for' regardless
jellyfish Yeah, with how USD is performing you're probably quite right. This is really a short-term, risk-off measure. Pretty much a substitute for what we are doing now, which is just holding USDC on our books while we decide an optimal strategy.
We could certainly get risk-on yield elsewhere, but we're in an in-between spot with this USDC. Ideally the risk-on deployment aligns with our strategic role as the decentral bank of carbon, instead of assuming risk solely for nominal yield.
This one is a no-brainer. For.
optima Gotcha, thanks for clarifying!
And I assume one restriction is that these funds have to stay within Polygon, correct?
Is this APY on a non-restricted basis - ie, you can withdraw anytime? Isn't Nexo offering much higher rates for USDC on Polygon?
Sirob Correct, withdrawal any time without penalty. Risk-off, blue-chip platforms, decentralized and permissionless. AFAIK Nexo isn't decentralized & non-custodial, they are more of a fiat on-ramp to defi?
The new NEXO bridge pools have like 17%, yeah, there're certainly more rewards out there - but come with priced-in risks as well.
Main hope here is just to whitelist a non-controversial, widely accepted top-performing platform, time-tested and rigorously audited, so we can not worry about risk while we devise a strategic deployment of this USDC.
Sirob I wouldn't be comfortable with NEXO because it would require a custodial wallet.
Yes we should!!