I appreciate your thorough reponse. If I could summarize the disconnect we are having. It lies solely with how you are defining "value" and how I am defining "value" when it comes to KLIMA the asset. I believe the community and team complicate what should be simple.
KLIMA, the asset should be designed in such a way where there is value inherent. I apologize but with an infinitely expanding supply. No prudent investor or rational human being (If they are capable enough to understand the underlying dynamics and numbers) would not invest in KLIMA.
The number one goal of KLIMA the project, should be to create inherent value in KLIMA the asset. How do you measure inherent value? Price. I hate to say it, but price increasing in web3 builds trust. and KLIMA the project has from a measurable perspective only achieved the opposite.
I believe the team and members of the community should acknowledge when original design was flawed. Pivot and fix the only problem that matters. All of the value propositions, partnerships, etc. I hate to be a realist but they do not matter if supply expands forever. I support the project but I think everyone needs to wake up a bit and rethink the core underlying mechanics and policy.
None of this even touches the fact that climate change may not even have anything to do with carbon credits or their subsequent prices rising. There are many angles that are unfolding.