desoa

  • Nov 23, 2023
  • Joined Mar 30, 2022
  • I'm for this proposal as it's clear Carbonmark requires more operational latitude to achieve its mission of increasing overall DCM throughput.

  • Strongly in favor of this proposal. The staking rate should be determined by the overall DCM environment and supply of carbon on Polygon.

  • I'm glad to see KlimaDAO continue to build during this bear period. I think reducing the reward rate further to extend the runway and provide breathing room to the protocol is a wise decision.

    Importantly, I'm sure the policy team would react to reverse this decision if market conditions improve over the coming weeks. The key is for the team to be agile, gather information, and make wise decisions which provide the resource runway necessary to build out the on chain carbon market.

  • There's a big opportunity here for positive press coverage around the crypto community taking the initiative to clean up the HFC credits - something the traditional market failed to do!

  • I support this proposal. KlimaDAO needs to be able to survive the bear while continuing to build out new products/services.

  • Treasury diversification is a plus to KlimaDAO and judging by the credits currently in the NBO pool I think it would be wise for KlimaDAO to accept them -- e.g. 2017 vintage Pacajai REDD+ Project in Brazil (high demand in the off-chain market).

    Additionally, the fact that C3 has the support of one of the largest carbon brokers in the VCM is encouraging for the prospects of the on-chain carbon market. They're a strong ally in the space and thus far have signaled nothing but support for KlimaDAO by, for example, utilizing KLIMA as the trading pair for all of their carbon pools.