• General
  • RFC: GRO Foundation ARR Project Funding

This RFC is in response to the RFC posted by KlimaDAO on September 7th, 2022: Carbon Project
Development Initiative

Project Overview

Introduction to the GRO Initiative and its GRO Foundation

“GRO” is a social-impact organization dedicated to planting 1 billion trees and helping to lift millions of
individuals and families out of poverty by 2030 using climate finance.

The GRO mission is to fund “un-fundable” social impact projects using climate finance and achieve the
vision of enabling vulnerable communities, women, and youth to take control of their own future.
GRO implements nature-based climate finance projects in line with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and
advises governments and NGOs on policy and methodologies to conceptualise, deliver and manage
climate finance solutions centered on nature-based carbon offset programs that are ISO14064-2 certified.
In a nutshell: Plant trees and create sustainable livelihood projects by connecting grassroots communities
to the global carbon market.

The goal is to re-establish natural biodiversity by restoring forest reserves, pocket forests and riverlands.
The core concept of the GRO methodology is to work with communities at a grassroots level and
incentivise them to plant the trees and act as stewards for the entire project duration.
We achieve this by funding water and food security projects, rural electrification as well as schools,
orphanages and skill centers for education and training. Finally, communities participate in profits from
carbon sales and receive microfinance for livelihood projects.

The Initiative and Foundation is registered in Lichtenstein and regulated by the financial conduct authority
to meet EU standards assured by its Trustee, the Euro Treuhand AG.

PDD link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IrjoMnHLFcqFePmYWSw4M3RsnBOCAVqr/view?usp=share_link

Project Overview Text

The GRO Initiative is listing three separate Project Design Documents in East Africa with a target of 500
million trees, split evenly between Uganda and Kenya, and 100 million mangroves in Kenya to be planted
by 2030.

We use the CDM-methodology AR-ACM0003: Afforestation and reforestation of lands except wetlands --

  • Version 2.0. For better transparency, we implemented a deviation to use census-based accounting
    exclusively instead of area-based assessment.

Simply put, we exclusively account for trees we planted ourselves i.e. 100% reforestation. Project
monitoring and reporting follows the ISO-14064 standard for Carbon Certificates to ensure project
integrity and further transparency.

Validation and verification is conducted by Carbon Check (https://www.carboncheck.co.in/), who have been working in carbon certification since 2011 and
are accredited by CDM, Verra, Gold Standard, ICR and other leading registries.

As we are focused on the European compliance market and are in touch with stock listed organizations,
who demand ISO-certifications, we chose to list our project on the International Carbon Registry, ICR,
which is an EU government approved registry that has embraced the ISO-14064 standard.

Our projects are designed to reestablish forest cover with natural biodiversity on deforested public and
institutional land with an assurance of permanence beyond the 45-year monitoring lifecycle.

Carbon sequestration models based on indigenous trees and their growth patterns conservatively
estimate a carbon sequestration of 400+ million tons per the PDD over a 45-year period.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY

Our methodology is centered on community stewardship, meaning that local community’s plant and
maintain trees for the long-term, while being trained and supervised by GRO staff and external
reforestation experts.

Through active stakeholder engagement, GRO has secured the endorsement by the Office of the Prime
Minister and is actively working with the ministry for water and the environment, the inter-religious
council of Uganda, UN Women, several kingdoms and Chiefdoms, district councils and community-based
organisations.

As part of our methodology, GRO does not become the landowner, but instead receives the right to plant
trees on public or institutional land from strategic partners as well as the right to utilise carbon certificates
under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

The strategic partners also support the project by mobilising communities for reforestation as well as
identify and distribute funds for social impact.

Participating stakeholders receive a share of net proceeds from carbon certificate sales, which is
distributed in three phases aimed at creating and maintaining permanent forest cover to increase
biodiversity and wildlife conservation.

Reforestation
• Secure and map deforested land owned by public or institutional partner
• Assign GRO Project Manager to planting area
• Connect with district forester of the national forest service
• Identify and engage with local community-based organizations and local tree planters
• Identify, appoint, and train Local Community Project Stewards
• Establish planting schedule and social impact schedule
• Establish GRO tree nursery and connect with local tree nurseries for scale
• Execute planting, monitoring and reporting plan
• Execute social impact plan

Social Impact
• Project begins
Upfront support of water, food and impact infrastructure projects
• Planting phase
Support of skills training, orphan, youth, women and small hold farmer programs with a focus on
production, services and entrepreneurial skills
• Monitoring phase
Provision of discretionary share and unsecured microfinance for livelihood projects

Project Status - Concept pilot in final stages
• Endorsement by Office of the Prime Minister, Ministry for Water end the Environment, National
Forest Service
• Training support by UN Women and Makarere University
• Land secured for 250 million trees provided by Inter-Religious Council and Kings Council of Uganda
• On target to plant 1 million trees as part of key staff training in 2023
• Supporting over 600 children, Xmas campaign with impact on 10.000 children in the works

Project Media
https://grofoundation.io/media/

Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Image 4
Image 5
Image 6
Image 7
Image 8
Image 9
Image 10
Image 11
Image 12
Image 13

Project Certifications

Project in final audit stage
https://www.carbonregistry.com
https://carboncheck.co.in/

dMRV components

We use an in-house GIS mapping team and are advised by several external experts including Dr Sudha,
Board Advisor to Gold Standard and Makarere University.

We access several bespoke databases for GIS mapping information to create baseline data. For monitoring
we additionally deploy the tree mapping app by plant for the planet, the custodian of the UN-Environment
global reforestation program.

We record plantation site boundaries, the number of trees, the species of trees, growth and fatality rates,
participating stakeholders, participating volunteers, responsible local facility stewards, assigned project
managers, assigned expert advisors, monitoring and reporting staff.

Find App information here: https://www.plant-for-the-planet.org/treemapper/

Project Proponents

GRO Initiative and Foundation
www.grofoundation.io

Inter-Religious Council of Uganda
https://www.ircu.or.ug/
https://daparrot.com/youth-sdgs-inter-religious-council-to-plant-250-million-trees/

Youth Coalition in Office of the Prime Minister of Uganda
https://sdgs.opm.go.ug/youth-coalition-for-sdgs/

UN Women
https://africa.unwomen.org/en/where-we-are/eastern-and-southern-africa/uganda

Plant for the Planet
https://www.plant-for-the-planet.org/trillion-trees/

Issuance Outlook

Assuming $250,000 initial investment, the GRO Initiative would offer ex-ante Carbon Offset Certificates
via the International Carbon Registry. Transfer of all Carbon Certificates would occur within 60 days of
payment, subject to final audit approval. Ideally, we would like to agree on ex-post maturity to occur over
a period of 5 years.

Delivery Failure protection:

If at the Delivery Date, defined in the table below, the amount of ISO-14064-2 Carbon Certificates (“VERs”)
is less than the amount of Contracted VERs, then a delivery failure has occurred (“Delivery Failure”). In
this situation, the Parties have that the Seller may either:

i) replace such undelivered Contracted VERs (“Affected Contracted VERs”) from the same project at
the Seller’s sole discretion or:

from a comparable project, in which the Seller shall provide the Buyer within sixty (60) Business Days after
the original Delivery Date with information regarding the alternative credits (“Replacement Units”)
including as to:
b) project name/ID;
c) location; and
d) project type.

It is the mutual intent of the Parties to complete the purchase and delivery of the VERs but it is at the
Buyer’s discretion, acting reasonably, whether to accept the Replacement Units, however, should the Buyer
decide to accept the Replacement Units, it will confirm its agreement of the same to the Seller within ten
(10) Business Days from the date of the receipt of the aforementioned information. The Seller shall then
deliver to the Buyer the Replacement Credits within ten (10) Business Days from the date of the Buyer’s
written notice of acceptance of such Replacement Units, or

ii) pay the original amount of the USDC calculated in accordance with Clause 6.2
iii) it is understood between the Parties that the Buyer can opt to get insurance on the delivery of EXPost Certificates based on the Buyer’s purchase of Ex Ante Certificates. This insurance is available through
Lloyd’s of London.

Vintage Year Acquired; Percentage of Total Purchased
2024; 2.04%
2025; 6.67%
2026; 15.65%
2027; 30.43%
2028; 45.21%
5 Year Total; 100.0%

Financials

USD 16.50 per ex-ante carbon offset certificate.

Acceptance of USDC as payment

Market Outlook

Deloitte made an upward adjustment to their market outlook and now estimates a 100 billion USD Carbon
Offset market.

Source: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/financial-servicesindustry-predictions/2023/financial-firms-carbon-offset-market.html

Co-Benefits

Project Co-Benefits
GRO prides itself in focusing on SDG impact and directly collaborates with Local UN Departments. Our
methodology is geared towards maximizing social impact for participating communities and we touch
every SDG.

Initially we focus on infrastructure for water and food security. This gives communities time to “think”.
Next, we focus on rural electrification and skills development with special care for orphans, youth and
women gaining applicable vocational skills and entrepreneurial training.

Finally, we provide unsecured microfinance for livelihood projects in exchange for protecting our trees.
Teaching a man to fish is not enough. We want this man or woman to have a boat, a fishing rod, and a
fishing net. We want him to catch enough fish so that another person can afford a truck just t transport
them to market for sale with enough supply that a third person can open a fish restaurant and a fourth
person industrialize fish to multiple other products for export.

This is how we beat poverty.

Partnership Co-Benefits

GRO offers multiple ways for collaboration beyond purchasing carbon certificates.

We white label our solution so that companies can use our social impact initiatives in their marketing
campaigns. We also enable white label campaigns that integrate tree planting with partners.

Our white label campaigns allow for community building and to pass on the cost of offsetting carbon to
the users, while enhancing corporate social responsibility and market credibility.
• Imagine if you could offer 1 tree to be planted for every sale or service of a certain value.
• Imagine if you could certify your product as green OR extend green certification to your clients
for purchasing your products or services.
• Imagine if you could launch your own e.g. We are planting 10 million trees, campaign!
• Imagine if you could support women, children and orphans and/or wildlife through your sales.

Thanks for submitting this comprehensive proposal Gro team!

Regarding dMRV, can you please direct us to where we can view tree planting data via the Plant for the Planet application? Is this data something that can be accessed and embedded in other applications (e.g. the Carbonmark marketplace)?

Additionally, could you provide further information around the activities / relationship between GroFoundation and the project proponents listed?

We're looking forward to learning more.

Hello,

Great questions!

We have letters of endorsement with the Office of the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Water and the Environment who manage the National Forest Authority.

Based on a publicly announced Framework agreement We work with kingdoms and the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda who provide land and mobilise communities.

For skills training, capacity building and impact projects we work with Makarere University departments, UN Women and the UN Youth Coalition of Uganda.

All above agreements have been audited by Carbon Check and we will publish that report as soon as we have it.

The first large scale phase of planting is on 56 sites the Busoga Kingdom.

We will export the KMZ files and share the link here asap to make Individual sites visible on Google Earth.

Follow this Twitter (X) thread to see the IRCU announcements. Just this week our logistics proposal Was signed of.

https://x.com/irc_uganda/status/1724430710444826907?t=aZL6NvceVXCbOSXT-Xt7Vg&s=08

Great to see this initiative and write-up on the Forum.

It is also encouraging to see a proposal coming from a project issued on the International Carbon Registry!

A few general questions:

  • To be clear, the proposal is to request funding for 3 separate projects, correct? In the meantime I have requested access to the PDD link if that will clear things up.

GRO does not become the landowner... instead receives the right to plant trees on public or institutional land from strategic partners

  • How does GRO secure long-term rights to use public or institutional land for tree planting and ensure these rights are maintained for the entire 45-year monitoring lifecycle? What are the legal agreements in place to prevent future land-use conflicts? What happens after - are there plans to transition project management and benefits to the community after the period?

Participating stakeholders receive a share of net proceeds from carbon certificate sales, which is
distributed in three phases aimed at creating and maintaining permanent forest cover to increase
biodiversity and wildlife conservation.

  • Do you -- and if yes, how do you -- report on the use of the funds? Are there public reports that demonstrate how funds are distributed between project stakeholders? (Related thought: one could envisage future innovations in the market that allow proceeds to be transparently collected and distributed from spot transactions too...)

  • Similarly, regarding the in-house GIS mapping and monitoring systems; is all this data publicly accessible? Are reports issued, etc... (will check out the App in the meantime, so ignore if the answer is that all the info is on the App!)

In principle I am supportive of moving this proposal to KIP stage at least:

  • Impact: Working with GRO Initiative clearly represents a climate financing opportunity that can have the positive social, environmental and economic impacts that KlimaDAO aspires to have.
  • Alignment: The size of this deal, the project type, and the registry it is issued on align with our strategic direction of allocating climate finance to a diversified set of projects that can feasibly be integrated into our tech stack to facilitate a closer connection between project developers and the market's demand side.
  • Partnerships: KlimaDAO aspires to empower organisations such as GRO Initiative to scale-up their impact (by supporting "unfundable" projects!); similarly the DAO itself requires organisations such as GRO Initiative to tap into the governance process and leverage the DAO's resources in order for it to be a long-term success and meaningful resource for the market. So, thanks for posting @Terry-GROFoundation and hope to see a strong partnership between the two organisations be forged together.

    0xy_Moron

    Hello,

    To be clear, the proposal is to request funding for 3 separate projects, correct? In the meantime I have requested access to the PDD link if that will clear things up.

    We are developing multiple projects, but this specific proposal is only a request for funding for our Uganda project. The Uganda project is in the final stages of the Validation Audit – see link in the previous post please.

    How does GRO secure long-term rights to use public or institutional land for tree planting and ensure these rights are maintained for the entire 45-year monitoring lifecycle? What are the legal agreements in place to prevent future land-use conflicts? What happens after - are there plans to transition project management and benefits to the community after the period?

    Very important question! In Uganda, the beneficial ownership of the land is held by indigenous populations. We have framework agreements with the Ministry of Water and the Environment, The Inter-Religious Council (IRC) and Kingdoms and Chiefdoms.

    These are the relevant land-owners. We are starting the first phase of planting with the IRC inside the Busoga Kingdom – Location KML Files will be shared shortly.

    The arrangement is as follows: Rather than purchase land, we work with grassroots communites in areas that have been de-deforested. We only work on public/communal land that is marked for permanent reforestation with natural biodiversity i.e. non commercial.

    We use a community stewardship model, whereas the community is mobilised to plant and maintain the trees under GRO and expert supervision.

    For this they get paid for their labour BUT more importantly we fund impact projects at a local level and leave them with infrastructure for food, water and power, funding of orphans and skills centers targeting small hold farmers, women and youth.

    Finally the communities also receive a pro-rata share of carbon offsests generated. That is made available at all stakeholder levels down to the grassroots level as unsecured microfinance for livelihood projects. For as long as they maintain the trees, the microfinance is considered paid.

    The goal is that these communities receive the funding to become employers of the future and independent of charity forever.

    • Do you -- and if yes, how do you -- report on the use of the funds? Are there public reports that demonstrate how funds are distributed between project stakeholders? (Related thought: one could envisage future innovations in the market that allow proceeds to be transparently collected and distributed from spot transactions too...)

    Yes. We intend to publish all reforestation and impact projects on our website on an ongoing basis and publish an annual report. We have already funded three skill centers and are currently funding school fees of 600 children who are orphans or from vulnerable communities

    • Similarly, regarding the in-house GIS mapping and monitoring systems; is all this data publicly accessible? Are reports issued, etc... (will check out the App in the meantime, so ignore if the answer is that all the info is on the App!)

    Yes we will be sharing GIS mapping on our website for each planting location and already share regular live updates on our social media @gro.foundation on Instagram.

    Happy to answer any more questions you may have 😊

      0xy_Moron

      Thank you 0xy_Moron for the detailed inquiry. We appreciate you taking the time to seek clarity on your good questions. I trust that Paul_GRO detailed answers adequately addressed all of your questions but if not, please let us know.

      0xy_Moron, we appreciate your well wishes and we too hope to form a strong and long lasting partnership with KlimaDAO. I think ultimately many of the aspirations and desires for a better world are aligned.

      After confirmation with the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda, we are allowed to publish our phase 1 scaling locations. These are all but 2 within the Busoga Kingdom of Uganda.

      The goal of the next rain season is to plant 1-2 million trees between March and May 2024. While we could do more, we primarily want to build experience in training local project managers, mobilising and managing communities and logistics first, before going bigger.

      These are Phase 1 locations for the March to May rainseason of 2024

      https://grofoundation.io/mapEarth.php

      4 days later

      This opportunity has been evaluated as per our Carbon Credit Evaluation and Acquisition Framework. Key areas of consideration are outlined below:

      Methodology: Evaluate he robustness of the project's carbon credit generation methodology.
      —> utilizes CDM-methodology AR-ACM0003: Afforestation and reforestation of lands except wetlands. This has widely been used by Verra and CDM previously. There has been far less controversy around this methodology compared to e.g. REDD+.

      Certification Standard: Assess the credibility and recognition of the certification standards applied to the carbon credits.
      → ICR utilizes the above methodology, VVBs that have worked with GS and Verra, and includes an ISO standard for calculating carbon mitigation and removal outcomes.

      Bridge Support: Determine compatibility with tokenization platforms that support the credits.
      → ICR bridge is in production with direct interfacing w/ Carbonmark

      Market Demand: Analyze on-chain credit retirements from the previous year and off-chain market demand indicators. For example, the following off-chain data sources may be utilized:
      —> Qualitative feedback from our carbon market advisors indicates that nature-based carbon removal projects are seeing an upswing in retirements and demand.

      Country: Consider the country of origin for geopolitical risk, local regulations, and environmental impact.
      —> Moderate risks in SSA offset through partnerships and local implementation partners such as Planet for the Planet and the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda.

      Environmental and Social Impact Metrics: Review the project's contribution to sustainability and its social and economic co-benefits.
      —> strong co-benefits have been outlined in the RFC above.

      Spot Price: Compare the spot price with the average market price to gauge profitability.
      —> ACR IFM: $15.80 (13.11.23); Redd+ CCB Brazil $10 (2018 vintage, 07.11.23); Other Verra afforestation: $14.50 - $17.50

      The evaluation framework has been completed below. Bold items indicate where this project has been scored.

      1) Company Financial Standing:

      • More than 12 months of financial runway: 10 points
      • 6-12 months of financial runway: 5 points
      • 3-6 months of financial runway: 3 points
      • Less than 3 months of financial runway: 1 point

      2) Security of End Market:

      • Confirmed buyer ready with a contract: 10 points
      • Demand known and buyer in negotiations: 5 points
      • Demand uncertain but potential buyers identified: 3 points
      • Demand and buyers not identified: 0 points

      3) Methodology On-Chain Presence:

      • Methodology already on-chain with high adoption OR Methodology not on-chain but with high adoption off-chain: 10 points
      • Methodology not on-chain but can be brought on-chain with high potential for adoption: 5 points
      • Methodology not on-chain and challenging to bring on-chain: 1 point

      4) Trailing Six-Month Purchase Volumes:

      • Purchase volumes significantly greater than the purchase amount: 10 points
      • Purchase volumes about equal to the purchase amount: 5 points
      • Purchase volumes less than the purchase amount but showing growth: 3 points
      • Purchase volumes minimal or declining: 0 points

      5) Registry Issuance:

      • Registry already issuing tokenized carbon with high liquidity: 10 points
        - Registry planning to issue tokenized carbon with confirmed demand: 5 points
      • Registry not yet issuing tokenized carbon and demand uncertain: 1 point

      6) Qualitative Assessments:

      • Strong positive trend in demand for this credit type based on market publications, data, and expert consensus: 10 points
      • Moderate positive trend based on market data and some expert support: 5 points
      • Uncertain or mixed signals regarding demand trends: 2 points
      • Negative trend or declining demand: 0 points

      7) Project Longevity and Scalability:

      • Proven scalability and a clear long-term operational plan: 5 points
      • Limited scalability but a long-term operational plan: 3 points
      • Unclear scalability and operational plan: 1 point

      8) Co-Benefits and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):

      • Addresses more than three SDGs with significant co-benefits: 5 points
      • Addresses at least three SDG with clear co-benefits: 3 points
      • Co-benefits or SDG alignment is minimal or unclear: 1 point

      9) Verification and Monitoring (preference for distributed ledger MRV - dMRV):

      • Verified with scalable dMRV: 5 points
      • Third-party verified without dMRV: 2 points We note that dMRV may be a larger component in the future.
      • Self-reported or unverified: 0 points

      10) Stakeholder Engagement and Social Impact:

      • Strong community support and positive social impact: 5 points
      • Some community engagement and social impact: 3 points
      • Minimal or no community engagement: 1 point

      11) Additionality and Baseline Scenario:

      • Strong additionality with a credible baseline scenario: 5 points
      • Some additionality, baseline scenario is reasonable: 3 points
      • Additionality and baseline scenario are weak or not well-defined: 1 point

      12) Project Type Diversification:

      • Project represents a new type for KlimaDAO's portfolio, enhancing diversification: 5 points
      • Project is similar to existing types but adds value or diversification: 3 points
      • Project is the same type as many existing holdings, offering little diversification: 1 point

      13) Strategic Value:

      • Project adds strategic value to KlimaDAO (e.g., opens new markets, enhances reputation): 5 points
      • Project has some strategic value but benefits are not clearly defined: 3 points
      • Project has no clear strategic value to KlimaDAO: 1 point

      Total points: 73

      As per the Carbon Credit Evaluation and Acquisition Framework, all carbon project funding RFCs must have at least 50 points to progress to the KIP stage. As it stands, the GroInitiative RFC can proceed to the next phase of KlimaDAO’s governance process.

        Thank you very much.
        I am very happy with that assessment.

        I appreciate the effort and look forward to KIP!

        Paul

        Write a Reply...