Yes! A two-way bridge is great new feature by which we hopefully gain some additional FUD resistance.
Although it's not clear to me how the market will value GNT tokens since these combine the value of the underlying carbon credits as well as a premium for DAO governance. This also means that their value might be a lot more volatile than BCT. What about bonding in times of high GNT valuation? Is "paying" such high premium a risk for Klima DAO?
sig What is Klima Infinity?
It's a program we're launching to incentivize long-term carbon custody and offsetting through the underlying tokenized carbon value growth of $Klima. It'll include important aspects such as an opt-in public pledge standard, a footprint v. carbon assets dashboard as a service and some other useful tools/incentives to help organizations on their journey to publicly offset their negative externalities. Stay tuned 
a two way bridge is a must! great invention guys!
GoddessDAO
I can see how being an offshore entity can be good for all the legal stuff. But won't it go against the purpose of the DAO? If it is a legal entity that would mean that someone (one individual or more) would be in control. And the rest of us would have to trust that these people do what the DAO decides. Or is it set up another way? Please enlighten me
Are the GNTs all consistent in the volume of GCO2 tokens included in the bundle (are some GNTs bigger than others)? If not, how does KLIMA plan on accounting for GNTs of varying carbon tonnage?
Love it!
GoddessDAO How transparent will the SPV and its actions be to the DAO and to Klima holders?
sodiumstar There will be a separate DAO token - so the GNT shouldn't trade at a premium for governance.
Clikkr 1 GNT = 1 GCO2 = 1 ton of carbon
rrrmmmmm As transparent as technologically and humanly possible.
I really like this. A two-way bridge will help Klima function as a versatile centre of the carbon market.
Am I right in concluding that bridging lots of retired carbon credits on chain (the current situation) is great for pushing up carbon prices but does not necessarily encourage buyers to venture on chain - but bridging un-retired credits (this proposal) will help with this? My thinking is that if credits become scarce off chain then buyers may see opportunities on chain to purchase - helping the on chain carbon market’s adoption.
If so then it could really help with Klima’s discovery and adoption phase of the roadmap.
Cheers!
In favor. This is great.
Question - do the GNT-funded projects have additionality? Diversifying and increasing carbon credits in the treasury is important, but we also should be looking to increase quality.
Thanks!
Another great project!
Nice beginning of the year 
let's grow together!
The deal seems good for either side and will really grow Goddess DAO and KLIMA altogether.
I have a question regarding the relation of Goddess DAO and Flow Carbon company, if the company ceases to do business in the future, will Goddess DAO still be able to retain their business process? or they are entirely dependent on it?
gib me all the carbon u got, all!
GoddessDAO I'm confused then - how can a GNT be a bundle if it is always equal to 1 GCO2 token? What exactly are bundled together to create the GNT?
